Tuesday, January 31, 2017
“In 2016, 11 States each produced more than $2 billion worth of nonfuel mineral commodities. These States were, in descending order of production value, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, California, Minnesota, Florida, Alaska, Michigan, Wyoming, Missouri, and Utah (table 3).”
Arizona' total non-fuel mineral production in 2016 was $ 5,560 million, 7.45% of U.S. total. Principal minerals, in order of value included: copper, sand and gravel (construction), molybdenum concentrates, cement (portland), stone (crushed). Once again, Arizona led the U.S. in copper production, with significant increase in copper production at Freeport-McMoRan's Morenci Mine.
In terms of gemstones production, Arizona tracked second in the U.S. behind Idaho. Arizona placed 7th in sand and gravel for construction production.
at 1:48 PM
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
The U.S. Geological Survey just released a report indicating that elevated uranium concentration in spring water north of Grand Canyon is NOT the result of nearby uranium mining activity. Elevated concentrations are instead likely due to natural sources and not to past mining at the nearby Pigeon Mine.
From the news release:
‘Pigeon Spring had elevated uranium levels in recent samples from 2012-2014 (73-92 micrograms per liter), compared to other perched springs in the same drainage area (2.7–18 micrograms per liter), and was proportionally elevated in samples collected prior to mining operations at the nearby Pigeon Mine.’
“It’s important to use science to understand the potential for mining impacts on water resources,” said Kimberly Beisner, USGS scientist and lead author of the study. “These results are the first step in understanding if uranium mining in the area may have any impact on water resources; in this case we determined those impacts are not likely at Pigeon Spring. These findings will help inform future studies to understand mining impacts in the region.”
Image: Pigeon Mine of northern Arizona. Photo by Don Bills USGS)
Posted on 1/25/2017 MC
at 1:31 PM
Monday, January 23, 2017
Figure 1. Appearance of Tator Hill fissures in December 2014 Google Earth imagery. Red arrows point to the new fissure; blue to an older, previously mapped fissure. Note sharp, unvegetated appearance of new earth fissure compared to old fissure. (Photo by B. Gootee)
Figure 2. New earth fissure trending north-south in the center of the frame. The sharp contrast in fissure geometry, from open, with a width and depth of 10s of feet, to a closed, crack-like feature, is apparent. (Photo by B. Gootee).
The width and depth of the new fissure varies dramatically along its length; from a narrow, inch-wide crack to a shallow crevice up to 10 feet wide and 25- to 30-feet deep. At 1.8 mile in length, this newest fissure is more than a ½-mile longer than other area fissure. Unlike older fissures in the Tator Hills, this fissure is free of vegetation, commensurate with having formed over just the past several years.
Comparing dated Google Earth imagery, AZGS Earth Fissure program manager, Joe Cook, determined the fissure began to form between Mar. 2013 and Dec. 2014. The onset of fissuring began in the north before extending southward and may have coincided with heavy rains in fall 2014. The southern portion of the fissure postdates the Dec. 2014 imagery.
Fissure Drone Video. On 19 Jan. 2017, AZGS’ Brian Gootee and Joe Cook, along with Arizona Dept. of Water Resources’ Brian Conway, captured the first drone video of a fresh earth fissure in Arizona (Figure 2, VIDEOS URL). The two videos illustrate the variable geometry (width and depth) and overall fresh appearance of the fissure.
Fissures videos at AZGSweb Youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xdAnftBKvY (2.75 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbd1sWPTxyk (1.75 minutes)
Geohazard! In urban areas earth fissures pose a substantial threat to infrastructure – homes, building, roads and bridges. In rural areas, fissures threaten roaming livestock and individuals recreating in off-road and 4-wheel drive vehicles. Fissure sidewalls are precipitous, unstable, and prone to sudden collapse that could snare an unwary observer standing on the collapsing edge (Figure 3).
Figure 3. AZGS geoscientists Brian Gootee, drone operator, and Joe Cook, earth fissure mapping program director launching the first drone-fissure exercise. Photo by B. Conway (ADWR).
that accompanies extensive ground water withdrawal in the Sonoran Desert. In Arizona, fissures first appeared near Eloy in 1929 and are now identified and mapped in basins in Cochise, La Paz, Maricopa, Pima and Pinal Counties; the Natural Hazards in Arizona viewer,
Natural Hazards in Arizona Viewer: an interactive map tool illustrating the distribution of earth fissures in south-central and southeastern Arizona.
Arizona Land Subsidence Group, 2007, Land Subsidence and Earth Fissures in Arizona: Research and Informational Needs for Effective Management: Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-07-C, 29 p.
Slaff, S., 1993, Land Subsidence and Earth Fissures in Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth #3, 30 p.
at 1:41 PM